0
0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/crimeflare/cloudflare-tor synced 2024-11-08 10:22:39 +00:00

Update 'instructions.md'

This commit is contained in:
docker 2020-02-18 00:21:30 -08:00
parent 922862ff86
commit f223f6cd7a

View File

@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Are you sure? *Remove* it from /split/ list and *add* to "[ex_cloudflare_users.t
<details>
<summary>_click me_
## Website is NOT using Cloudflare / Website is rejecting Tor visitor
## Website is NOT using Cloudflare
</summary>
@ -97,24 +97,14 @@ Are you sure? *Remove* it from /split/ list and *add* to "[ex_cloudflare_users.t
| /cidr_data/?.txt | CIDR, ASN |
- **Anti-Tor users** | [**List Directory**](anti-tor_users/)
| List name | Description |
| -------- | -------- |
| **/fqdn/attd_?.txt** | **Split files (FQDN)** |
- Add-on "[Kiu retejo malakceptis min?](subfiles/about.urjm.md)" will help your domain collection.
- Add-on "[Ĉu ĉi tiuj ligoj blokos Tor-uzanton?](subfiles/about.isat.md)" will tell you which link rejected Tor visitor.
![](image/siteground.jpg)
- Above is how Siteground-hosted([INAP](https://www.inap.com/press-release/inap-completes-acquisition-singlehop/);[Singlehop](https://www.siteground.com/blog/siteground-partners-singlehop/)) sites often appear to Tor visitors when timeouts/tarpitting doesn't occur.
- Some news websites are liars. You can read their website if you are not using Tor nor VPN. If you visit their website over Tor, they just say "Sorry, article not found".
```
About "CDN FQDN list"
@ -131,7 +121,7 @@ senate.gov
```
Some websites use other companies with the CloudFlare business model.
Some websites use other companies _with_ the CloudFlare business model.
This is a collection of websites that ban Tor exits, other than through Cloudflare(e.g. showing access denied pages, systematic timing out connections, ...).
@ -142,6 +132,57 @@ This is a collection of websites that ban Tor exits, other than through Cloudfla
<details>
<summary>_click me_
## Website is rejecting Tor visitor
</summary>
- **Anti-Tor users** | [**List Directory**](anti-tor_users/)
| List name | Description |
| -------- | -------- |
| **/fqdn/attd_?.txt** | **Split files (FQDN)** |
- Add-on "[Kiu retejo malakceptis min?](subfiles/about.urjm.md)" will help your domain collection.
- Add-on "[Ĉu ĉi tiuj ligoj blokos Tor-uzanton?](subfiles/about.isat.md)" will tell you which link rejected Tor visitor.
![](image/tor_nontor_diff.jpg)
- Some news websites are lying to Tor users. You can read their website if you are not using Tor nor VPN. If you visit their website over Tor, they just say "Sorry, article not found".
How can you trust their news if they are not treating everyone equally?
```
About "CDN FQDN list"
www.example.com
---> www.example.com is using CDN.
?.akamaiedge.net
---> subdomain of akamaiedge.net is using CDN.
* unique hostname will be masked as "(subdomain)".
senate.gov
---> base domain is using CDN.
```
If your website is on this list, you better talk with your network administrator.
**But the website X no longer blocking Tor users!**
Are you sure? There are two ways to remove yourself.
First option is just _*remove* it from the list_ and _create a pull request_.
Second option is _wait 1 year_. We will revisit your website as a Tor user. If you're not blocking us, you will be removed.
</details>
------
<details>
<summary>_click me_
## How to add your data
</summary>
@ -158,7 +199,8 @@ A or B will be enough. Thank you for your contribution.
- Type B: Just scan the FQDN
1. Scan FQDN on "[Is MITM?](https://searxes.eu.org/collab/sxes/tool_ismitm.php)" webpage. (or just use "MITM test API", "Detect CDN API")
1a. [Cloudflare/CDN] Scan FQDN on "[Is MITM?](https://searxes.eu.org/collab/sxes/tool_ismitm.php)" webpage. (or just use "MITM test API", "Detect CDN API")
1b. [Anti-TOR] Just use "Is it blocking Tor? API".
2. It will be pushed to OpenPrivacy automatically within a week.
</details>