From a52eb17fc2657bf597980c58f5116b1e2d10475c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Strickx Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:25:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- subfiles/the_trouble_with_codeberg.md | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/subfiles/the_trouble_with_codeberg.md b/subfiles/the_trouble_with_codeberg.md index ba608322..483bc52e 100644 --- a/subfiles/the_trouble_with_codeberg.md +++ b/subfiles/the_trouble_with_codeberg.md @@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ were spotted publicly promoting Cloudflare. ## Codeberg-inflicted censorship After someone -[on Codeberg's staff](https://codeberg.org/shadow/SpywareWatchdog/issues/77#issuecomment-188105) +[on Codeberg's staff](https://web.archive.org/web/20210414001524/https://codeberg.org/shadow/SpywareWatchdog/issues/77#issuecomment-188105) was added to the Cloudflare supporter list, Codeberg shut down the CFT project and issued -[this statement](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/423#issuecomment-187783) +[this statement](https://web.archive.org/web/20210414001651/https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/423#issuecomment-187783) to contributors, and posted [this blog announcement](https://web.archive.org/web/20210406012737/https://blog.codeberg.org/on-the-cloudflare-tor-takedown.html), allegedly in response to complaints. @@ -90,17 +90,17 @@ We know this is not true because Germans have access to the mirror sites. Codeberg's *false* accusation of *illegal* activity came with *destructive* removal of forked repositories -[without warning, without redress, and while refusing explanation](https://codeberg.org/shadow/SpywareWatchdog/issues/77#issuecomment-188170) +[without warning, without redress, and while refusing explanation](https://web.archive.org/web/20210414001524/https://codeberg.org/shadow/SpywareWatchdog/issues/77#issuecomment-188170) to the users whose data they destroyed. In response, Codeberg -[claims](https://codeberg.org/shadow/SpywareWatchdog/issues/77#issuecomment-188178) +[claims](https://web.archive.org/web/20210414001524/https://codeberg.org/shadow/SpywareWatchdog/issues/77#issuecomment-188178) they had to act immediately to what they perceived as *illegal* activity. Even if we were to accept that the already public data -somehow became sensitive merely by replication, the correct +somehow became sensitive merely by replication, the *correct* non-reckless action is to quarantine the data in a non-public state until court proceedings or settlement could commence. -For Codeberg to destroy people's work, and also destroy what they believed was +For Codeberg to *destroy* people's work, and also destroy what they believed was evidence of illegal activity was nothing short of reckless. Codeberg's haphazard response has actually created a legal liability for themselves, as they *needlessly* destroyed people's work without due @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ surrounding the word "`support`". The listed party claimed to not personally condone Cloudflare and thus claimed to not be a Cloudflare "supporter" on that basis. -However, investigation of [public statements](https://codeberg.org/swiso/website/issues/141#issuecomment-69593) +However, investigation of [public statements](https://web.archive.org/web/20210109122213/https://codeberg.org/swiso/website/issues/141#issuecomment-69593) by that individual revealed that the other party *actually* supported Cloudflare *operationally*. Note that Codeberg *destroyed* the investigation logs which led to the finding, so we can't cite them here.